- Delete any texts asking you to confirm or provide personal information. Legitimate companies don’t ask for information like account numbers or passwords by text or email.
- Don’t reply, and don’t click on links provided in the message. Links can install malware and take you to spoof sites that look real but whose purpose is to steal your information.
- Don’t give out any personal information in response to a text. A spammer wants access to your Social Security number, credit card numbers, and bank and utility account numbers to open new accounts in your name.
- Report spam texts to your carrier. AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, Sprint or Bell subscribers can copy the original text and forward it to 7726 (SPAM), free of charge.
- Review your cell phone bill for unauthorized charges.Report them to your carrier.
Showing posts with label spam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spam. Show all posts
Monday, July 7, 2014
What To Do When You Get a SPAM Text Message
I've been getting these daily it seems. The Federal Trade Commission has a set of guidelines you can use. Here's FTC recommendations on what to do when you get a spam text message:
Posted by Gordon F Snyder Jr at 3:50 PM 2 comments
Labels: cell, communications, Education, message, phone, scam, spam, Technology, text
Monday, June 4, 2012
Likejacking Using Social Media Spam
Social media spam is taking off and it is not good. Up until a year or so ago, spam was primarily delivered using email. As email spam filters have improved - spammers have turned to an easier target - social media sites including Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter.
How bad is it getting? Mark Risher, CEO of Imperium is quted in a recent Business Week piece claiming spammers create as many as 40% of the accounts on social media sites. He also says about 8 percent of messages sent via social pages are spam. This is twice the volume of six months ago.
Here's how it works in Facebook - it can be as simple as liking or sharing an image or page which could allow a spam app access to your profile and friend list. Many are now referring this as "likejacking" or "clickjacking". Pinterest is extremely vulnerable with spammers embedding links in pictures - click a thumbnail to view a picture and you may end up linked to someplace you do not want to go.
Social media sites are playing catchup now, hiring hundreds of programming specialists and security experts to protect users from spammers. It will get better.
Last January, Facebook sued Ascend Media, an advertising firm that, according to the same Business Week piece, is pulling in around $960 thousand per month. In addition, Twitter recently sued alleged spammers Skootle and JL4 Web Solutions.
Bottom line - don't friend, like, share, click, users and things that look spammy.
How bad is it getting? Mark Risher, CEO of Imperium is quted in a recent Business Week piece claiming spammers create as many as 40% of the accounts on social media sites. He also says about 8 percent of messages sent via social pages are spam. This is twice the volume of six months ago.
Here's how it works in Facebook - it can be as simple as liking or sharing an image or page which could allow a spam app access to your profile and friend list. Many are now referring this as "likejacking" or "clickjacking". Pinterest is extremely vulnerable with spammers embedding links in pictures - click a thumbnail to view a picture and you may end up linked to someplace you do not want to go.
Social media sites are playing catchup now, hiring hundreds of programming specialists and security experts to protect users from spammers. It will get better.
Last January, Facebook sued Ascend Media, an advertising firm that, according to the same Business Week piece, is pulling in around $960 thousand per month. In addition, Twitter recently sued alleged spammers Skootle and JL4 Web Solutions.
Bottom line - don't friend, like, share, click, users and things that look spammy.
Posted by Gordon F Snyder Jr at 7:33 PM 0 comments
Labels: Education, Media, Social, spam, technician, Technology
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Twitter Revisited: Shark Jumping, Apps and Metrics Podcast
On Sunday, Mike Qaissaunee and I recorded a 36 minute and 40 second podcast onTwitter applications, shark jumping and metrics.
Listen to it directly in your web browser by clicking here.
If you have iTunes installed you can subscribe to our podcasts by clicking here.
If you have iTunes installed you can subscribe to our podcasts by clicking here.
Here's the intro and list of questions asked during the podcast:
Intro: Twitter has become a household word for many of us - just like Google , YouTube , MySpace and Facebook (among others) have in the past. Chris Brogan (in this video) even calls Twitter his "central nervous system". We first podcast on Twitter almost two years ago. In this podcast we take an updated look at Twitter.
Two years is a long time ago it seems. Probably one of the biggest things in my arsenal is my iPhone today. Two years ago the iPhone did not exist. What's changed in two years with Twitter?
What are some of your favorite apps?
What's up with all this Twitter following - how should we be handling?
I've been hearing the term "jump the shark" recently when some discuss Twitter. What does that mean?
I notice a lot of business people using Twitter, maybe it has jumped the shark. What are they doing? How are business people using it?
So, lots of people seem to be giving Twitter a try but how do we know who has actually drank the kool-aid and has become a daily Twitter user?
I've been hearing the term "jump the shark" recently when some discuss Twitter. What does that mean?
I notice a lot of business people using Twitter, maybe it has jumped the shark. What are they doing? How are business people using it?
So, lots of people seem to be giving Twitter a try but how do we know who has actually drank the kool-aid and has become a daily Twitter user?
We talk a lot about impact when it comes to grants - can you explain what that means?
So, what's the interest in things like Twitter?
What are some Twitter measurement tools?
We've come across a couple of tools that attempt to measureTwitter - a web-based application called Twitter Grader and another called Twinfluence .
Twitter Grader is interesting but there is not a lot of detail. Can you discuss Twinfluence?
Didn't Twinfluence at one time try to measure efficiency?
So, Twinfluence attempts to measure more things. How does it compare to Twitter Grader?
What about spam?
So, what did this guy do?
How do metrics applications handle these spammers?
What can be done to prevent Twitter manipulation?
Are there any other Twitter based applications we should be looking at?
We should see applications like these improve?
So, has Twitter jumped the shark yet?
Here's how you can get the answers:
To read show notes and listen to Mike Q and my 36 minute and 40 second podcast titled Twitter Revisited: Shark Jumping, Apps and Metrics, click here .
Posted by Gordon F Snyder Jr at 8:35 PM 0 comments
Labels: Grader, jump the shark, Social Media, spam, Technology, Twinfluence, Twitter, Twitter Grader
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)