This summer I spent some time reading Martin Sauter's excellent new book Beyond 3G, Bringing Networks, Terminals and the Web Together. In the book Martin describes the movement in the wireless/cellular world away from circuit-switched telephony technologies like 2G, 2.5G (EDGE) and even 3G to 4G based technologies like LTE and WiMAX.
What does wireless technology have to do with copper wires? Like these wireless technologies, the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) uses circuit-switched telephony technology designed around voice. Even DSL (a technology basically designed to extend the life of the copper wire based network by a few years) is a circuit-switched service - Internet based traffic goes to the Internet and voice traffic goes - you guessed it - right to the PSTN.
Circuit-switch based networks have made a lot of sense for the past 100 years or so.
The problem with these circuit-switch based networks though is they were designed for voice. Sauter argues correctly that when networks are designed for specific applications, there is no separation between the network and the applications which ultimately prevents evolution. In addition, tight integration of applications and networks also prevents the evolution of an application because changing the applications also requires changes to the network itself. The PSTN basically cannot evolve beyond where it is now - it's been tweaked-up to the point where it cannot be tweaked-up any more.
Internet (TCP/IP based) technologies work using exactly the opposite approach. A neutral transport layer carries packets and any kind of application (voice, video, data, etc) can efficiently send high and low volumes of data through the network. For applications the connection process is transparent - the device operating system establishes an Internet connection before the application is even launched. The network and any applications running that use the network are independent of each other.
Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint, etc are all moving to non-circuit-switched IP based 4G technologies like WiMAX and LTE to handle voice, video and data traffic. It is inevitable that Verizon's landline division (along with other landline carriers) move in this same direction.
Gordon,
ReplyDeleteThanks for explaining all of this in layman's terms. Deb
Great job! Linanne
ReplyDeleteGlad you have finally recognized the importance of WiMax. But you still need to recognize that someone has to work with Verizon's cast offs (such as FairPoint and Frontier) and that ADLS2 and ADSL2+ are important technologies for the support of the wireline based local access to the network. Further consideration should also be given, bearing in mind that WiMax and ADSL2+ are only replacements for the local loop, to the value of MPLS as a tool to reduce costs and increase efficiency of the supporting wire/fiber/microwave infrastructure
ReplyDeleteThanks Terry. Like you I'm very concerned about the rural providers/areas.
ReplyDelete